[dropcap style=”font-size:100px; color:#992211;”]B[/dropcap]ad farming and eroding soil was what killed off the Mayans. So say soil experts at Brigham Young University.
And being that their campus is based in Utah, they ought to know a bit about bad farming and soil erosion.
Despite the ancient Mayans’ inability to find sustainable ways to feed itself, there are still those who insist that this is a culture capable of predicting the Earth’s doom at the end of this year. Fair enough. First-hand experience of their own apocalypse gives them a certain credence.
For the rest of us, New Year’s Day 2013 almost certainly promises the usual hungover head-clutching, with the added novelty of perhaps wishing that the world had ended. At least before that bottle of mescal was opened.
After emerging sometime before 1000 BC, the Maya rose to become the most advanced Pre-Columbian society in the Americas, thriving in jungle cities of tens of thousands of people, such as the one in Guatemala’s Tikal National Park. But after reaching its peak between 250 and 900 AD, the Maya civilization began to wane and exactly why has been an enduring mystery to scientists.
Writing in the Nov.-Dec. issue of the Soil Science of America Journal (SSSA-J), an interdisciplinary team led by Richard Terry, a Brigham Young University soil scientist, now describes its analysis of maize agriculture in the soils of Tikal. Not surprisingly, the study uncovered evidence for major maize production in lowland areas, where erosion is less likely and agriculture was presumably more sustainable for this community of an estimated 60,000 people.
But the team also discovered evidence of erosion in upslope soils, suggesting that farming did spread to steeper, less suitable soils over time. And if Maya agriculture did cause substantial erosion, the soil loss could eventually have undercut the Maya’s ability to grow food, say the researchers.
[quote]artwork and buildings can crumble over time and jungles will eventually conceal ancient farm fields, but “the soil chemistry is still there[/quote]
The findings are just the latest example of how invisible artifacts in soil—something archeologists literally used to brush aside—can inform studies of past civilizations. That’s because artwork and buildings can crumble over time and jungles will eventually conceal ancient farm fields, but “the soil chemistry is still there,” Terry says.
He explains, for example, that most forest vegetation native to Tikal uses a photosynthetic pathway called C3, while maize uses a pathway called C4. The soil organic matter derived from these two pathways also differs, allowing researchers to make conclusions about the types of plants that were growing in the soils they test.
Thus, by analyzing soils in different areas of Tikal as well as looking at the layers that had formed in the soils, Terry and his collaborators were able to map the areas where ancient maize production occurred, including lowland “bajo” areas and possibly steeper slopes, as more food was needed.
Questions like this about past farming practices have always interested archeologists, Terry notes. But the tools of modern soil science are now enabling these scientists to ask increasingly sophisticated questions about how ancient peoples tried to sustain themselves—and whether their treatment of the land was a factor in cases where they failed.
“[These tools] open us up to thinking about the world in ways that we haven’t before,” Terry says. “We have changed the paradigm amongst the archaeologists.”
Source: Brigham Young University